LogFAQs > #913970224

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicContest Stats and Discussion - Part 1321
creativename
12/11/18 8:29:53 PM
#113:


KamikazePotato posted...
creativename posted...
Luigiman59 posted...
Link absolutely needs to be permanently retired. You remove him and the contest becomes unpredictable and more fun.

Im not sure how even the biggest Link fanboys can look at his performance and be like yeah knowing who is going to win before the contest even starts is much more entertaining. Selfish.

The notion of a popularity contest with the most popular characters removed is such a silly idea.

We've done this in many brackets, and each time in resulted in a better contest than if we hadn't. All these late game matches are 1/3 as exciting as they should be because the final winners spot isn't on the line.

So give Link a bye to the last two rounds.

Removing him totally because he always wins us just stupid. Its a *popularity* contest. The most popular character *should* win.

I dont get what these matches have to do with Link being removed? These matches arent that interesting because they are losers matches. It would be different if they counted.

In actuality one of the reasons Link is less interesting now is because of the anti-votes. Watching him smash turbofodder used to be fun. Now he cant reach those heights anymore.

I think removing Link altogether would just be dumb. If you want him to not take everybody out, either:

-Give him a bye to the semi-finals

-Put the entire Noble Nine plus Zelda plus Pikachu on the opposite side of the bracket from him. This way he doesnt prevent any interesting matches between elites.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1