LogFAQs > #913591460

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicMueller ain't fuckin around with this probe, man.
ImTheMacheteGuy
12/05/18 2:09:50 PM
#65:


Houston posted...
loafy013 posted...
Houston posted...
What were Flynn's contacts with a Russian official about? Collusion? No.

Have any of Mueller's arrests dealt with collusion? No.

Has Donald Jr. even been subpoenaed? Nah

Flynn's cooperation could have been "substantial" in many regards, but none indicate his cooperation was substantial for Trump-Russia collusion, which is what the Dem rallying cry is all about--- "Impeach 45! Trump colluded with Russia!"--- nah. Doubt it.

Good thing people with a brain are aware that there is no "collusion charge" in the law. Now conspiracy with a hostile nation is another story.


Replace collusion with "conspiracy to commit election meddling with a hostile nation" and my reasoning stands the same.

None of Mueller's indictments or charges have anything to do with the sort (besides the useless indictments of the several who will never even be extradited). It seems his investigation is wrapping up, too. Thank god. So people on the "Impeach Trump" side for meddling, conspiracy, collusion, whatever, better be praying Mueller pulls something out of left field.


If you want to get the people at the top, you start at the bottom and charge the bottom people with whatever is applicable to them specifically and you get them to cooperate. If you want to take down a cartel boss, you start with street dealers. You don't just charge those dealers with all of the crimes you're going after the boss for. That wouldn't make sense.
---
Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1