LogFAQs > #913519295

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Zelda > Mario?
STElNER 12/04/18 9:04:43 AM #18:	Nanis23 posted... Hey moron, look at my registration date I have been here longer than you, you don't teach me this stuff no need to throw around the moron here - i do know the original definition is muddy by now, as i distinctly remember them being clearly "defined" when i first came to the board in 2004. so to say that sonic wasn't definitively a member until 2006... well it just shows we're using the wrong definition. i believe it was actually theorized around the top 9 characters who were the same top 9 in both 2002 and 2003 besides magus being a part of a percent above sonic, and with him not being present in 2002 it was a simple enough definition. <cite>STElNER posted [p:913519295] in Zelda >... [t:77266743]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nanis23 posted...</cite> <quote>Hey moron, look at my registration date I have been here longer than you, you don't teach me this stuff</quote> no need to throw around the moron here - i do know the original definition is muddy by now, as i distinctly remember them being clearly "defined" when i first came to the board in 2004. so to say that sonic wasn't definitively a member until 2006... well it just shows we're using the wrong definition. i believe it was actually theorized around the top 9 characters who were the same top 9 in both 2002 and 2003 besides magus being a part of a percent above sonic, and with him not being present in 2002 it was a simple enough definition.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1