LogFAQs > #913316472

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do they call it circumcision instead of male genitalia mutilation?
Aculo 11/30/18 4:02:46 PM #209:	DrCidd posted... So, in your opinion, would it be okay to surgically remove the nipples of every infant boy? They literally don't serve any purpose, it's just a useless artifact remaining from when the baby was in the early developmental stage. Using the logic that "it's useless, it's just a quick cut of barely anything that guys won't even remember happening" fits pretty well here in your opinion. if it prevented the nipple-equivalent of smegma, overwhelmingly reduced the chance of a serious infection and several horrific diseases, AND it eliminated the chance of any woman vomiting every time she saw them, then yes... yes, that would be fine, ok? --- ok? <cite>Aculo posted [p:913316472] in Why do the... [t:77247204]...</cite> <quote><cite>DrCidd posted...</cite> <quote>So, in your opinion, would it be okay to surgically remove the nipples of every infant boy? They literally don't serve any purpose, it's just a useless artifact remaining from when the baby was in the early developmental stage. Using the logic that "it's useless, it's just a quick cut of barely anything that guys won't even remember happening" fits pretty well here in your opinion.</quote> if it prevented the nipple-equivalent of smegma, overwhelmingly reduced the chance of a serious infection and several horrific diseases, AND it eliminated the chance of any woman vomiting every time she saw them, then yes... yes, that would be fine, ok? --- ok?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1