LogFAQs > #912747871

Doctor Foxx posted...

Muscles posted...

I didn't imply my time, or anyone's, is worth more than the world...

Im a libertarian, I don't think governments should do more than what is listed in the constitution (I know it only applies to America, but I would argue that it would improve many places, but that's for another discussion) and taking away cars isn't in there, saving the world isn't in there

I would argue governments are incapable of saving the world from climate change, or anything else and it's more up to scientists to find a solution (whether it's greener cars or something else entirely)

Where does the government come into this exactly? No one talked about banning cars. Public transit is something the majority of America supports.

The biggest offenders are not individual citizens, they are large industrial entities that need more oversight. They're deferring the environmental costs of doing business to everyone else

Individuals do need to take action. Everyone does. And if that means getting somewhere a little slower on someone else's schedule at times, that's life. What a minor sacrifice

If sounded like you did, not outright but that was the vibe I was getting, if im etting about that then im sorry.

I definitely agree with the 2nd part, though i'm not sure what oversight would be needed or even possible, but I think that's definitely where we should be looking at.

I think we can agree something needs to be done, and that corrupted industries are the biggest offenders, I think we should definitely do everything we can to get off fossil fuels but in the meantime I don't think using cars less will make too much of an impact
---

Muscles
Chicago Bears | Chicago Blackhawks | Chicago Bulls | Chicago Cubs | NIU Huskies