LogFAQs > #912584682

solosnake posted...

I wish we could combine EU4 and Crusader Kings 2. I love the character focus and traits of CK2 the most, but I really like EU4's warfare, navies, tech, massive world with exploration and coloniazation, peace deals, ect.

Also being able to play anywhere in the world really is a huge advantage for eu4 imo.

I'd like to see the borders of CK expanded, but I get why the character focus is dropped in EUIV. The time period just doesn't work with it. Of course there were still important figures, but nations sort of took the focus over 'houses'.

Anyway, I conquered Sweden, Denmark, and Norway and reformed the faith. We are Unyielding, Sea-Bound, Meritocratic, and Autonomous now. Saxony has held out and we are allied now. I haven't gone feudal yet, because I focused all my early game money on stability, but Ireland and Wales have been lucrative so I'll probably go feudal soon.

I've got a question, though. Since we can't raise tribal armies anymore, is there any point in not going feudal? Before, the tribal armies meant the difference between survival and being swept under the fuedal/iqta, but I don't really see any advantage now that it is gone.