The sex binary is not a catch all, you're the one ignoring that literal fucking geneticists say on the subject. You must know better than them though, with your zero qualifications.
Your only examples are literal deformities, so I'm not too certain on that.
They're not even classified as deformities by the appropriate medical fields that they're relevant to. Glad to know you don't actually care about being accurate.
Arguing semantics doesn't push a debate forward. Whatever you want to call intersex people, they are plagued by a physical disorder that is not directly related to this topic. They are not part an example of an alternate sex. They do not prove any idea that genitals are not indicative of sex. It's like trying to say there is a spectrum of the number of human fingers because we can technically be born with zero to ten or more.
It's not semantics, it's literally the consensus of the relevant medical fields that it's not a deformity.
Just take the L you're embarrassing yourself.
Why would I take the l when I'm not the one audacious enough to disagree with the literal medical community's definitions. ---