LogFAQs > #912378791

The msnbc clip was amusing, since it falls under that whole news ancher having a moment catagory.

Oh well... I didn't watch the first vid yet, but something tells me based on the thumbnail/title and the length it's not good.

One of the problems I've noticed with the whole furry thing is, it's like someone selected 'all of the above' on a filter and it collects way too many from different ranges. Not all are bad, some are very mild/tame barely registering as one, but since it pairs well with so much it's like running into a minefield on stilts. It's only a matter of time before you find ones that love zoo, vore, scat, etc. Again, those can be isolated or paired with other stuff. Maybe someone loves dressing up as an adult baby and playing with the family dog, but being a furry is too far for them.

I'm not going to even attempt to defend them as a whole, since even I have many moments of "whelp" and disappointment.

Also the above, if you have no sona or suit, but enjoy the fur revealing side it'd be a furvert or somesuch. It's been a while so the term might have changed. Hell if I know... I don't go to the cons and avoid 98% of the online side for the last several years. cuz even i kno