May I ask why you think Im Republican? Thats part of the problem of your way of thinking. Anyone who thinks X must be X. X is the enemy. The enemy is evil.
Because I've seen your posts here for the better part of a year and you routinely side with them? I don't care what you're registered as, when you continuously support and vote for one side over the other, you are that side. And no, I don't think all Republicans are evil, stop putting words in my mouth.
nemu posted...
Its a loophole because it didnt factor in the existence of such people when it was established. It did not predict how the borders and sovereignty of countries would be developed.
Uh, yes, it absolutely did that, as it was signed into law as part of the Reconstruction amendments following the Civil War. And likewise if that's your argument then I hope you're in favor in completely tossing out the Constitution as a whole and rewriting it to adapt to modern times. If you think the 14th amendment is outdated there are proper channels to amend it, and shoddy EO's aren't one of them.
nemu posted...
The children of illegal citizens should not be citizens of this country. They never should have been. It leads to bad practices like anchor babies. Those who are already citizens should obviously keep their citizenship, but it should not be a thing going forward.
And again, you lack the fortitude to tell people that were made citizens this way you don't think they belong.
The act of assigning a label to someone because of a viewpoint they hold is putting them in a box and declaring them an enemy. That is a bad way of doing things.
And now youre jumping to extremes for no particular reason. Ancor babies are a problem. The wording somewhere should be changed to fix that.
The final lacking fortitude bunk is yet another attempt at labeling. Its also a dumb argument.