That just makes Wikipedia even less credible. It's an opinion based blog that only chosen members can edit?
You're really reaching for the goalpost aren't ya?
He IS a Trump apologist, goes without saying
If there's incorrect information on a non-credible website that only chosen moderators can edit, it's definitely not credible.
Are they accepting Wikipedia as a source on your dissertation yet?
But your claim was that anyone can get on there and edit it.
I was incorrect in that, as the last time I really tried to use Wikipedia as a source that was the case. It's changed since then, it seems, and that makes it even less credible.
I would never, in any academic setting, attempt to reference Wikipedia.
So you're saying that Wiki have it wrong about the PBs? ---
Seriously. I don't care what side of the fence someone is on, if they are a piece of crap, they are a piece of crap.