LogFAQs > #911150080

Holy fuck. Okay so you make it into some fetish, you aren't trans yet you're convinced you know more than somebody who fucking is and who actually does the research, and you're doing some classic victim blaming. When it comes to civil rights, there is no "discussion" with this stuff. When the ends of the spectrum are
A) people who want to destroy transgender people simply for existing
And
B) trans people who simply want to exist

You don't fucking try to find some middle ground, because that middle ground is always going to say that we don't belong in some situation. And demanding that we have to convince our oppressors is historically asinine.

Know how most movements got started? Gay rights movement? Attributed heavily to the Stonewall riots where a trans woman of color threw a brick at a police officer who had been sent to arrest people there for breaking the law by being homosexual. Workers rights in most of the world? More often than not, there were tons of riots and factory owners being threatened. Hell, the United States wouldn't exist today if not for open rebellion against Britain because you can't honestly expect the oppressed to try and negotiate with people who are actively trying to grind you into the dirt beneath you (sometimes figuratively, sometimes literally). So maybe learn to shut the fuck up and not do the tactics you're doing. That's called truscum logic, and it's the combination of that and respectability politics that harm trans people by creating a proof of burden that isn't even scientifically validated at this point in time.