LogFAQs > #911019552

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hair Color at a job
KingButz 10/23/18 12:24:12 PM #76:	Ashethan posted... KingButz posted... Nobody in the first world will discriminate based on your innate hair color. That's not a thing and its disingenuous to suggest that anyone ever would. So it's okay to discriminate because it's not 'natural'. Seems to be along the same lines as people saying it's okay to discriminate against gay people or transgender people. Ok you are literally just trolling now Kenri posted... KingButz posted... Don't be purposefully obtuse. I'm sure op's friend can put on a hairpiece if she refuses to dye her hair it's not purposely obtuse, it's literally the distinction I'm talking about? also I sorta doubt the hairpiece thing if they're not even letting her keep it pink until she's hired KingButz posted... No business would discriminate against people because their natural hair color is pink. sure they would lmao, businesses will discriminate for literally anything it probably wouldn't be as common as hair color restrictions in dress codes, sure Please direct me to an instance in the last 50 years where a business has ever unjustly discriminated against someone because of innate hair color. That's absurd. --- no <cite>KingButz posted [p:911019552] in Hair Color... [t:77122027]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ashethan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingButz posted...</cite> <quote> Nobody in the first world will discriminate based on your innate hair color. That's not a thing and its disingenuous to suggest that anyone ever would. </quote> So it's okay to discriminate because it's not 'natural'. Seems to be along the same lines as people saying it's okay to discriminate against gay people or transgender people.</quote> Ok you are literally just trolling now <cite>Kenri posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingButz posted...</cite> <quote> Don't be purposefully obtuse. I'm sure op's friend can put on a hairpiece if she refuses to dye her hair</quote> it's not purposely obtuse, it's literally the distinction I'm talking about? also I sorta doubt the hairpiece thing if they're not even letting her keep it pink until she's hired <cite>KingButz posted...</cite> <quote> No business would discriminate against people because their natural hair color is pink.</quote> sure they would lmao, businesses will discriminate for literally anything it probably wouldn't be as common as hair color restrictions in dress codes, sure</quote> Please direct me to an instance in the last 50 years where a business has ever unjustly discriminated against someone because of innate hair color. That's absurd. --- no</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1