LogFAQs > #910866271

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump is trying to appeal the decision that he can't block people on twitter.
DarkTransient
10/20/18 5:52:42 PM
#11:


Tmaster148 posted...
DarkTransient posted...
tldr; are we talking "he wants to block them on his account so he doesn't see them" (in which case why the fuck shouldn't he be able to?), or "he wants to block them from the platform altogether" (in which case, get fucked Trump)?


When you block someone on twitter they can't view your profile and can't respond to your tweet. This violates the first amendment, because it means he's preventing people from talking to him.


The first amendment doesn't oblige any specific person to hear what you have to say. It just means you cannot be punished for saying it.

I'll definitely agree that it's really immature and whiny, but thinking it's actually illegal or unconstitutional is ridiculous.
---
Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1