LogFAQs > #910720658

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWoman: Has abortion, no problem. Man: Attempts to give abortion pill, 22 years
Dragonblade01
10/18/18 12:46:13 AM
#297:


BarneyBosco posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
BarneyBosco posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
The questions of whether potential parents should be afforded the opportunity to relinquish parental rights and whether abortion should be permissible are completely separate.

And I think the answer to both should be yes.

Great. Who pays for the relinquished child? Keep in mind not many people willingly adopt cute cats let alone ghetto children.

That's something that would need to be worked out. It may even prove to be infeasible at the moment. Unfortunately, I don't have all the answers. However, assuming it's achievable, I think a society of willing parents would be better than a society of unwilling parents.

Its not infeasible, its elementary. You fuck up and you're responsible, equally. Parents are great when they live and work together with their children.

That has nothing to do with the question of whether expecting parents should have the opportunity to relinquish parental rights. It also has nothing to do with how such a system should be designed, what it's limits would be, any necessary compromises, etc.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1