LogFAQs > #909646693

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	imagine being accused of doing something 40 years ago
Funbazooka 09/29/18 3:18:46 AM #97:	darkjedilink posted... Funbazooka posted... My original point was that just because something is fully allowed thatdoesn't make it okay. This is what you disagreed with. And you clearly said if something is fully allowed it means there's nothing wrong with it. If something is "not okay," how is it considered "allowed?" Give me an example of something a group considers "not okay," but that group explicitly allowing it. I'm talking about legally permissible things that are okay by law, but are not considered okay depending on who you go around asking. That's it. Umm for example... off the top of my head... a movie written and cast with all male characters, no females and militant feminists have a problem with it. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:909646693] in imagine be... [t:77049416]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>My original point was that just because something is fully allowed thatdoesn't make it okay. This is what you disagreed with. And you clearly said if something is fully allowed it means there's nothing wrong with it.</quote> If something is "not okay," how is it considered "allowed?" Give me an example of something a group considers "not okay," but that group explicitly allowing it.</quote> I'm talking about legally permissible things that are okay by law, but are not considered okay depending on who you go around asking. That's it. Umm for example... off the top of my head... a movie written and cast with all male characters, no females and militant feminists have a problem with it. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1