LogFAQs > #909646617

Funbazooka posted...

My original point was that just because something is fully allowed thatdoesn't make it okay. This is what you disagreed with. And you clearly said if something is fully allowed it means there's nothing wrong with it.

That's because you assumed "fully allowed" was referring to its legality. You were incorrect in your assumption. I'll say this again, I hope you listen to this part.

From the very beginning I was arguing that believing Ford was fully allowed, meaning there's nothing wrong with it whatsoever. So yes, when I say something is fully allowed, it means I'm saying there's nothing wrong with it. You tried to argue that I claimed something being fully legal means there's nothing wrong with it, this mistake was due to your incorrect assumption that when I said something was"fully allowed" I was referring specifically to it's legality.

Are we clear now?
---

Now you can't call me a sigless user.