LogFAQs > #909644290

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topicimagine being accused of doing something 40 years ago
nicklebro
09/29/18 1:48:13 AM
#81:


Funbazooka posted...
nicklebro posted...
The part I don't get is "even if they're obeying the law?". Why would obeying the law make something more likely to offend me? You should just try to reiterate your question,. Because I am not sure what you're asking and definitely no idea how it relates to my post.


My claim was that just because something is fully allowed according to the law doesn't mean there's nothing wrong with it.

You said the fact that the law allows it does mean there is nothing wrong with it.

I'm asking you if you can conceive of anything a person might think, say, or do (albeit completely legal) that would offend your sense of what is right and wrong?

I never said that because the law allows it that leaves there's nothing wrong with it. I never mentioned it's legality at all. I simply stated the fact that there is indeed nothing wrong with it. I said it's "allowed" as in it's a socially acceptable thing to do, you took it as meaning "it's legal" which was incorrect.

And even then, your question makes no sense. Just because something might offend me doesnt mean that it isn't ok to do it. Whether something offends me or not is irrelevant, what does matter is if something is rational and if it is justified.
---
Now you can't call me a sigless user.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1