LogFAQs > #909626804

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Fallout 4 > Fallout 3 > Fallout New Vegas > Fallout 1 > Fallout 2
MC_BatCommander 09/28/18 7:06:23 PM #10:	UnfairRepresent posted... I just don't get how you can put NV ahead of 3. I like it more UnfairRepresent posted... On a smaller map with less to do and a worse story. Also it's glitchy as fuck I mean, map size =/= quality of the game, and as far as I know the maps are the same size. Besides, NV has more locations to discover than 3. Also NV has far more quests and unmarked quests (like twice the amount) so it definitely doesn't have less to do. Far as story is concerned, that's purely subjective but I like NV's much more than 3's. Glitches have long since been fixed but if I had played it at launch I would definitely knock the game as I know it was a mess at launch. --- The Legend is True! <cite>MC_BatCommander posted [p:909626804] in Fallout 4 ... [t:77049488]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I just don't get how you can put NV ahead of 3.</quote> I like it more <cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>On a smaller map with less to do and a worse story. Also it's glitchy as fuck</quote> I mean, map size =/= quality of the game, and as far as I know the maps are the same size. Besides, NV has more locations to discover than 3. Also NV has far more quests and unmarked quests (like twice the amount) so it definitely doesn't have less to do. Far as story is concerned, that's purely subjective but I like NV's much more than 3's. Glitches have long since been fixed but if I had played it at launch I would definitely knock the game as I know it was a mess at launch. --- The Legend is True!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1