LogFAQs > #909499112

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPeople who are at fault in accidents that back up the freeway
OhhhJa
09/26/18 5:20:44 PM
#51:


adjl posted...
While true, that's a pretty useless statement. If you want to decrease accidents, you need more specifically-targeted measures than "you should all stop making mistakes," and that means identifying specific risk factors. Speeding is one of the varieties of human error that contributes to accident rates. Designing cars to be unable to exceed local speed limits is one way to address that, thereby reducing accident rates.


Man, the goalposts sure have shifted since the beginning of this topic. Mostly due to sunny derailing it like he often does with his ignorance. We were proposing ideas earlier in the topic that address human error. Fines, stricter testing and revoking licenses were a few of those. I think deterrents like this would decrease the overall level of negligence and human error. I dont think anyone in the topic are against other ideas for reducing the amount of accidents though. Accidents on the interstate are incredibly dangerous. If you cause one, the status of your license should absolutely come into question
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1