LogFAQs > #909268905

Alpha218 posted...

PS2 had a great library though. I mean overall, not just vs other Final Fantasy titles.

Anyways, I mean I had fun with the gameplay of 10. It's the minigames that weren't that great.

I never got to play the PS1 FFs. I want to get into 7 soon and see why it's hailed as the best ever. FFs I played: 4, 6, 10 (my first one), 13 (I didn't have as bad an opinion as everyone else idk why though), Crystal Chronicles. I'm probably going to try 12 when it comes to Switch and I never played X-2 even though it's in my Steam library.

I agree about ten being fun, but the mini games sucked. Keep an open mind playing 7, 8, and 9 because part of their lasting impact was the massive step up. I still think they aged well, especially compared to this new crap.

Im thinking of trying 12 if it comes to switch, but only if its discounted. No way Im paying $60 for it. X2 is just an insult to the fans. I couldnt make it past the intro scene and I only had it because it was included with X. They know thats the only way to sell it.


I mean Square could be pulling their heads out of their asses on this one. Not that I expect FF to go back to the way it used to be... but Octopath was a huge success and now they're porting over some of the bigger FF games to Switch... maybe they realize the market for those games isn't gone. I don't hate on the new style of FF game but I don't get why they can't do both.


I agree. Im cautiously optimistic. They actually issued a public apology and admitted that they didnt think western people would buy it. Money talks and these developers might be listening (finally).
---

#MakeFinalFantasyGreatAgain