LogFAQs > #909149477

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man who violently raped 60 women to be released despite history of reoffending.
UnfairRepresent 09/20/18 9:15:02 PM #73:	asagi_mode_gone posted... I didn't imply anything, I pointed out the disparity in severity of sentencing for nonviolent crimes black men are convicted of and how comparably tame the sentencing for violent crimes committed by white men are. asagi_mode_gone posted... There's black people and homeless people who stole under $100 and got harsher prison sentences than this guy for that single conviction Then I responded for you to elaborate if you literally meant that, and you responded that you did by posting a dishonest article and then refusing to back down when it was revealed that you were lying.... You complain that everyone is changing what you are saying... When the only person who has changed what you said is you. Who has now backed down from "Black men get 30+ year sentences for stealing under $100!" to "Hey come on guys, black guys can sometimes get harsher sentences than whites for the same crime maybe..." Which is comical. asagi_mode_gone posted... You really can't argue without shoving words in others mouths or attacking them, can you? Not a rhetorical question btw, I'm asking because what I think you'll say and what is the case probably won't align but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt which is infinitely more than you've afforded me. I've given you like 17 oppotunites, 18 now following this post to back up anything you're saying and all you have done is not back yourself up, not admit fault, and lie. So how is that not giving you the benefit of the doubt? I'll continue to give you the benefit of the doubt by once again asking: Show me a single example of someone who got the same sentence this rapist did because they stole under $100 in the west. In your next post give an example of that, or admit you were wrong and apologize. If you simply go "You're changing what I am saying" like a coward, then I won't respond to you anymore because you're not saying anything at all and there is nothing else I can say other than: Show me a single example of someone who got the same sentence this rapist did because they stole under $100 in the west. Over and over again --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909149477] in Man who vi... [t:77023431]...</cite> <quote><cite>asagi_mode_gone posted...</cite> <quote> I didn't imply anything, I pointed out the disparity in severity of sentencing for nonviolent crimes black men are convicted of and how comparably tame the sentencing for violent crimes committed by white men are. </quote> <cite>asagi_mode_gone posted...</cite> <quote> There's black people and homeless people who stole under $100 and got harsher prison sentences than this guy for that single conviction</quote> Then I responded for you to elaborate if you literally meant that, and you responded that you did by posting a dishonest article and then refusing to back down when it was revealed that you were lying.... You complain that everyone is changing what you are saying... When the only person who has changed what you said is you. Who has now backed down from "Black men get 30+ year sentences for stealing under $100!" to "Hey come on guys, black guys can sometimes get harsher sentences than whites for the same crime maybe..." Which is comical. <cite>asagi_mode_gone posted...</cite> <quote> You really can't argue without shoving words in others mouths or attacking them, can you? Not a rhetorical question btw, I'm asking because what I think you'll say and what is the case probably won't align but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt which is infinitely more than you've afforded me.</quote> I've given you like 17 oppotunites, 18 now following this post to back up anything you're saying and all you have done is not back yourself up, not admit fault, and lie. So how is that not giving you the benefit of the doubt? I'll continue to give you the benefit of the doubt by once again asking: Show me a single example of someone who got the same sentence this rapist did because they stole under $100 in the west. In your next post give an example of that, or admit you were wrong and apologize. If you simply go "You're changing what I am saying" like a coward, then I won't respond to you anymore because you're not saying anything at all and there is nothing else I can say other than: Show me a single example of someone who got the same sentence this rapist did because they stole under $100 in the west. Over and over again --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1