LogFAQs > #909144075

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man who violently raped 60 women to be released despite history of reoffending.
asagi_mode_gone 09/20/18 7:36:05 PM #57:	DarkTransient posted... UnfairRepresent posted... DarkTransient posted... asagi_mode_gone posted... UnfairRepresent posted... I responded to the only one you had a link for and the link was full of misinformation. I'll rephrase for you since you're an immensely dishonest human being. Show me a single case in the west of someone who spent 30 years behind bars for stealing less than $100. Ah, going straight to the ad hominems. Nice form. Says the guy going straight to the fallacy fallacy. He's doing everything he can to distract from the fact no one has been behind bars for 30 years for stealing under $100. He was just lying and refuses to admit it Oh, I know. He'll eventually find an example where "theft under $100" was one of dozens of charges and claim that's his counterexample or something, too. Sequence of events Sentenced to 30+ years Behind bars for that prison sentence for the crime At a later point, appeals got a reduced sentence Step 2 happened so yeah, some people were behind bars and at that given point in time facing 30+ years. But what you're actually asking for is somebody who served 30+ years for it and you're dancing around acknowledging that despite it being tacitly implied. <cite>asagi_mode_gone posted [p:909144075] in Man who vi... [t:77023431]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>asagi_mode_gone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I responded to the only one you had a link for and the link was full of misinformation. I'll rephrase for you since you're an immensely dishonest human being. Show me a single case in the west of someone who spent 30 years behind bars for stealing less than $100.</quote> Ah, going straight to the ad hominems. Nice form.</quote> Says the guy going straight to the fallacy fallacy.</quote> He's doing everything he can to distract from the fact no one has been behind bars for 30 years for stealing under $100. He was just lying and refuses to admit it</quote> Oh, I know. He'll eventually find an example where "theft under $100" was one of dozens of charges and claim that's his counterexample or something, too.</quote> Sequence of events Sentenced to 30+ years Behind bars for that prison sentence for the crime At a later point, appeals got a reduced sentence Step 2 happened so yeah, some people were behind bars and at that given point in time facing 30+ years. But what you're actually asking for is somebody who served 30+ years for it and you're dancing around acknowledging that despite it being tacitly implied.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1