LogFAQs > #909143801

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Man who violently raped 60 women to be released despite history of reoffending.
asagi_mode_gone 09/20/18 7:30:38 PM #53:	DarkTransient posted... asagi_mode_gone posted... UnfairRepresent posted... I responded to the only one you had a link for and the link was full of misinformation. I'll rephrase for you since you're an immensely dishonest human being. Show me a single case in the west of someone who spent 30 years behind bars for stealing less than $100. Ah, going straight to the ad hominems. Nice form. Says the guy going straight to the fallacy fallacy. Acknowledging the opposition is refusing to actually participate in discussion in lieu of actually debating is not itself a fallacy. The post was him changing the requirements from "somebody sentenced to 30 years" to "somebody who served 30 years". As he moved the goalposts and went full ad hominem, it demonstrated he had zero actual intention of a fair or even reasonable discussion. Which is to say, I could watch paint dry and not waste as much time as trying to convince somebody who refuses to even bother with basic debate etiquette. <cite>asagi_mode_gone posted [p:909143801] in Man who vi... [t:77023431]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>asagi_mode_gone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>I responded to the only one you had a link for and the link was full of misinformation. I'll rephrase for you since you're an immensely dishonest human being. Show me a single case in the west of someone who spent 30 years behind bars for stealing less than $100.</quote> Ah, going straight to the ad hominems. Nice form.</quote> Says the guy going straight to the fallacy fallacy.</quote> Acknowledging the opposition is refusing to actually participate in discussion in lieu of actually debating is not itself a fallacy. The post was him changing the requirements from "somebody sentenced to 30 years" to "somebody who served 30 years". As he moved the goalposts and went full ad hominem, it demonstrated he had zero actual intention of a fair or even reasonable discussion. Which is to say, I could watch paint dry and not waste as much time as trying to convince somebody who refuses to even bother with basic debate etiquette.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1