| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Do you believe kavanaugh's accuser? |
| DarkTransient 09/19/18 10:31:17 PM #46: | Sativa_Rose posted... The fact that it was so long ago and that there isn't any evidence other than her word against his is not enough proof to deny his confirmation, IMO. In general, the people who want him denied because of this are people who already didn't want him on the SCOTUS. Put it this way. If the accusations are proven true, I definitely don't think he should be on there. And it's worth investigating before confirming him, given that there's reason to believe it's not just a spur-of-the-moment thing made up for a political stunt (yes, the timing may be a political stunt, but that doesn't have any impact on the truthfulness of the claim itself). However, it absoutely should not be handled on the basis of "guilty until proven innocent". Unless it's proven or he confesses, there's not much that can be done. --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |