LogFAQs > #909049837

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Right wing websites moving swiftly to attack Kavanaugh accuser
Wil_Knights 09/19/18 10:57:28 AM #83:	legendary_zell posted... Wil_Knights posted... Anteaterking posted... This is what so many on the right are doing. Not just "innocent until proven guilty", but going out of their way to try to discredit the accuser based on internet sleuthing. She was already caught in a lie though. She said that his friend witnessed the entire thing happen, but he spoke recently on the matter and said that this event never happened in the first place. So either two people are lying, or one person is lying... I can't help but think logically and scientifically, so I'd need to see some physical evidence to believe what the accuser is saying. The fact she was paid by Feinsteine to come forward makes the accusation extremely suspicious. Otherwise, you're deciding the fate of a man's career and life based on a high school rumor that has zero physical evidence behind it, that an "eye-witness" named by the accuser says didn't happen. He said he didn't recall. And of course he did because otherwise, he'd be publicly admitting to being an accessory to attempted rape. You're talking about science and needing a high level of evidence to prove someone's guilt and destroy their life and reputation. But you're willing to take an inconclusive statement and use it as conclusive proof that the accuser is a politically motivated liar, destroying her life and denying her assault. Why didn't this come out much earlier? If it was actually serious or really happened, you think that it would have been brought up... you know, right after it happened? Maybe it didn't happen at all like the accuser said, and it's just a politically-motivated scheme to stop him from being nominated to the SC. Do you have any evidence at all or any source with evidence? The timing is just too perfect for this NOT to be politically-motivated. What bothers me the most about this whole thing is that these accusations are being trumpeted by The Washington Post, which is essentially a leftist propaganda outlet. It's just a leftist version of Breitbart... they openly said they wanted Hillary to win, so why would I trust what they say about one of Trump's nominees when there is no evidence to back the claim up and it happened so long ago that no one has any recollection of the event? --- SaGa Frontier is my favorite game series :) <cite>Wil_Knights posted [p:909049837] in Right wing... [t:77012391]...</cite> <quote><cite>legendary_zell posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wil_Knights posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote>This is what so many on the right are doing. Not just "innocent until proven guilty", but going out of their way to try to discredit the accuser based on internet sleuthing.</quote> She was already caught in a lie though. She said that his friend witnessed the entire thing happen, but he spoke recently on the matter and said that this event never happened in the first place. So either two people are lying, or one person is lying... I can't help but think logically and scientifically, so I'd need to see some physical evidence to believe what the accuser is saying. The fact she was paid by Feinsteine to come forward makes the accusation extremely suspicious. Otherwise, you're deciding the fate of a man's career and life based on a high school rumor that has zero physical evidence behind it, that an "eye-witness" named by the accuser says didn't happen.</quote> He said he didn't recall. And of course he did because otherwise, he'd be publicly admitting to being an accessory to attempted rape. You're talking about science and needing a high level of evidence to prove someone's guilt and destroy their life and reputation. But you're willing to take an inconclusive statement and use it as conclusive proof that the accuser is a politically motivated liar, destroying her life and denying her assault.</quote> Why didn't this come out much earlier? If it was actually serious or really happened, you think that it would have been brought up... you know, right after it happened? Maybe it didn't happen at all like the accuser said, and it's just a politically-motivated scheme to stop him from being nominated to the SC. Do you have any evidence at all or any source with evidence? The timing is just too perfect for this NOT to be politically-motivated. What bothers me the most about this whole thing is that these accusations are being trumpeted by The Washington Post, which is essentially a leftist propaganda outlet. It's just a leftist version of Breitbart... they openly said they wanted Hillary to win, so why would I trust what they say about one of Trump's nominees when there is no evidence to back the claim up and it happened so long ago that no one has any recollection of the event? --- SaGa Frontier is my favorite game series :)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1