LogFAQs > #908952533

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Does anyone actually believe the accusation against Kavanaugh?
Nomadic View 09/17/18 8:37:11 PM #138:	Tmaster148 posted... Nomadic View posted... Tmaster148 posted... Nomadic View posted... Tmaster148 posted... Nomadic View posted... He certainly shouldnt be denied his Supreme Court position over an unsubstantiated claim. A delay isn't a denial. It absolutely is when the Democrats are blatant about denying anyone Trump nominates. You mean like how Republicans denied Obama's nominees? Sorry if I don't feel bad for the tables being turned on the Republicans. So, youre conceding that is a denial? No. I still think a delay when the president still has 2 more years isn't a denial. But if you want to believe it is a denial I still won't feel bad. Ok, then were back on track with the original argument. Yes, this is absolutely a denial. The entire purpose of the delay is the hope of gaining seats which will in turn give Democrats the authority to reject nominations for at least two years. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:908952533] in Does anyon... [t:77012611]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote>He certainly shouldnt be denied his Supreme Court position over an unsubstantiated claim.</quote> A delay isn't a denial.</quote> It absolutely is when the Democrats are blatant about denying anyone Trump nominates.</quote> You mean like how Republicans denied Obama's nominees? Sorry if I don't feel bad for the tables being turned on the Republicans.</quote> So, youre conceding that is a denial?</quote> No. I still think a delay when the president still has 2 more years isn't a denial. But if you want to believe it is a denial I still won't feel bad.</quote> Ok, then were back on track with the original argument. Yes, this is absolutely a denial. The entire purpose of the delay is the hope of gaining seats which will in turn give Democrats the authority to reject nominations for at least two years. --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1