LogFAQs > #908764307

CyricZ posted...

nemu posted...

It's very easy: people should avoid circumstances in which chance of harm is greatly increased. If you have knowledge of something, avoid it. It doesn't make the crime any less severe. It shouldn't lessen the punishment for the crime. The crime is all on the criminal, but to say a person has no fault if they could have avoided it entirely with a normal action is dumb.

Ah, so "if you have knowledge of something, avoid it". The knowledge in this case being that if you're transgender, you have a much greater chance of people killing you.

Because people can't control themselves.

Just, you tell them you're trans, and they just... lose their goddamn mind. Can't do anything about it.

Oh, look here.

https://www.advocate.com/transgender/2018/9/07/these-are-trans-people-killed-2018#media-gallery-media-4

I'm sure these 20 murdered transgender people could have prevented their deaths if only they weren't sneaky or deceptive.

Now the cruise liner has sunk. I'm sort of confused how you got to this point. Did you miss where I explicitly said random acts of violence are not something that can be avoided. Being trans in public is not something I would consider something avoidable. Living your life is not avoidable. Choosing to sleep with people without disclosing their status as trans is avoidable. They can find someone accepting of who they are.