LogFAQs > #908753724

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 191: Hey Now, You're a Lodestar
SupremeZero 09/14/18 3:16:00 PM #456:	Obellisk posted... Corrik posted... Obellisk posted... Corrik posted... Eddv posted... Corrik posted... It would be absurd to delay his confirmation considering the political timing over an unsubstantiated claim. Why? Every claim is unsubstantiated until its investigated. That's like....why they investigate He can be investigated once confirmed. It's not like he magically is above the law if he is appointed. (Apparently the President is somehow supposedly and I disagree on that). appoint the potential attempted rapist, we can always fix that later... Welcome to innocent until proven guilty. Yes innocent until proven guilty. But in a case like this where he is about to be appointed to the supreme court, I do not see why a few days cannot be taken to make sure its all a bunch of hooey. No, not innocent until proven guilty, Innocent until proven guilty involves the perspective you're intended to take on a case, not "We should assume he's innocent and therefore appoint him to the highest court in the country without investigating" Like, this is just a complete failure of the concept. You assume they're innocent while investigating, not not bother investigating at all, otherwise there would be no "Proven Guilty" part. --- There's always hope for better things in life. But you can't let anything, friend, lover,God himself,be your hope. You have to be your own hope <cite>SupremeZero posted [p:908753724] in Politics C... [t:76989412]...</cite> <quote><cite>Obellisk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Obellisk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>It would be absurd to delay his confirmation considering the political timing over an unsubstantiated claim.</quote> Why? Every claim is unsubstantiated until its investigated. That's like....why they investigate</quote> He can be investigated once confirmed. It's not like he magically is above the law if he is appointed. (Apparently the President is somehow supposedly and I disagree on that).</quote> appoint the potential attempted rapist, we can always fix that later...</quote> Welcome to innocent until proven guilty.</quote> Yes innocent until proven guilty. But in a case like this where he is about to be appointed to the supreme court, I do not see why a few days cannot be taken to make sure its all a bunch of hooey.</quote> No, not innocent until proven guilty, Innocent until proven guilty involves the perspective you're intended to take on a case, not "We should assume he's innocent and therefore appoint him to the highest court in the country without investigating" Like, this is just a complete failure of the concept. You assume they're innocent while investigating, not not bother investigating at all, otherwise there would be no "Proven Guilty" part. --- There's always hope for better things in life. But you can't let anything, friend, lover,God himself,be your hope. You have to be your own hope</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1