LogFAQs > #908483680

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you live in California? Are you ready for your taxes to go up yet again?
DarkTransient
09/10/18 4:19:20 PM
#32:


SideshowBob311 posted...
Why do liberals insist on trying to qualify crimes and criminals? "Oh it's a VICTIMLESS crime so it's ok" or "Well that's an UNJUST law, so breaking it shouldn't matter".

What ever happened to just "don't break the law"?


No, I think they're spot on with that there are such problems with some laws, and that some criminals definitely are more dangerous than others - letting a murderer back on the streets is a horrible idea; letting a drink-driver back out (as long as they're not allowed to drive in the interim) isn't really that big a deal.

Where they are wrong, is that they take this to ridiculous extents. They'll claim things like laws against theft or vandalism (usually right after they've had a protest where lots of that occurs) are "unjust laws" or "victimless" when they're not. Also, the very obvious racial element - the same crime, to them, will be an "unjust law" when a minority is arrested for it, but perfectly fine when it's a non-minority. Their base idea is fine, they just apply it to things it shouldn't be applied to.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1