Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Do you live in California? Are you ready for your taxes to go up yet again? |
DarkTransient 09/10/18 4:19:20 PM #32: | SideshowBob311 posted... Why do liberals insist on trying to qualify crimes and criminals? "Oh it's a VICTIMLESS crime so it's ok" or "Well that's an UNJUST law, so breaking it shouldn't matter". No, I think they're spot on with that there are such problems with some laws, and that some criminals definitely are more dangerous than others - letting a murderer back on the streets is a horrible idea; letting a drink-driver back out (as long as they're not allowed to drive in the interim) isn't really that big a deal. Where they are wrong, is that they take this to ridiculous extents. They'll claim things like laws against theft or vandalism (usually right after they've had a protest where lots of that occurs) are "unjust laws" or "victimless" when they're not. Also, the very obvious racial element - the same crime, to them, will be an "unjust law" when a minority is arrested for it, but perfectly fine when it's a non-minority. Their base idea is fine, they just apply it to things it shouldn't be applied to. --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |