LogFAQs > #908227219

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Confidential Kavanaugh Documents leaked by booker (full text)
Hawaiian_punch 09/06/18 1:04:01 PM #11:	NinjaWarrior455 posted... solosnake posted... whitelytning posted... To me, it reads as more of him providing two methods to do something, one is race neutral, one isn't, but he recognizes that there is (some) legal support for both positions. And you think it is acceptable to have a lifetime appointee to our highest court that believes it is okay to use racial profiling because it has precedent in history? Sadly any roar that Dems make about this will be drowned out because a large portion of the GOP base is in favor of racial profiling. This isn't going to change how the members of the Senate vote and a large portion of their constituents will still support him. That's the sad reality of this. But it will piss people off and ensure a blue wave <cite>Hawaiian_punch posted [p:908227219] in Confidenti... [t:76973506]...</cite> <quote><cite>NinjaWarrior455 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>solosnake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>whitelytning posted...</cite> <quote>To me, it reads as more of him providing two methods to do something, one is race neutral, one isn't, but he recognizes that there is (some) legal support for both positions.</quote> And you think it is acceptable to have a lifetime appointee to our highest court that believes it is okay to use racial profiling because it has precedent in history?</quote> Sadly any roar that Dems make about this will be drowned out because a large portion of the GOP base is in favor of racial profiling. This isn't going to change how the members of the Senate vote and a large portion of their constituents will still support him. That's the sad reality of this.</quote> But it will piss people off and ensure a blue wave</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1