LogFAQs > #908226625

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Confidential Kavanaugh Documents leaked by booker (full text)
whitelytning 09/06/18 12:52:49 PM #5:	Hawaiian_punch posted... whitelytning posted... I skimmed the docs and really it doesn't seem like much on its face. I think the bigger issue here is that docs like this are being withheld. I can see people pointing to the e-mails about racial profiling for security in 2002 as being bad but to me it just reads like a really intelligent lawyer providing information to a client. "This is the general law and here are the exceptions, I like this idea, and if followed it presents this type of problems." My problem (and hopefully the Dem's) is his refusal to answer questions about these opinions/e-mails and what could be in the other 100k+ docs. Uuhhhh. Kavanaugh was advocating for racial discrimination. This is huge Its not though because there is legal precedent that supports making non race neutral decisions and treating people differently based on their race. To me, it reads as more of him providing two methods to do something, one is race neutral, one isn't, but he recognizes that there is (some) legal support for both positions. --- ********************************************** https://imgur.com/iZdWIKJ <cite>whitelytning posted [p:908226625] in Confidenti... [t:76973506]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote><cite>whitelytning posted...</cite> <quote>I skimmed the docs and really it doesn't seem like much on its face. I think the bigger issue here is that docs like this are being withheld. I can see people pointing to the e-mails about racial profiling for security in 2002 as being bad but to me it just reads like a really intelligent lawyer providing information to a client. "This is the general law and here are the exceptions, I like this idea, and if followed it presents this type of problems." My problem (and hopefully the Dem's) is his refusal to answer questions about these opinions/e-mails and what could be in the other 100k+ docs.</quote> Uuhhhh. Kavanaugh was advocating for racial discrimination. This is huge</quote> Its not though because there is legal precedent that supports making non race neutral decisions and treating people differently based on their race. To me, it reads as more of him providing two methods to do something, one is race neutral, one isn't, but he recognizes that there is (some) legal support for both positions. --- ********************************************** https://imgur.com/iZdWIKJ</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1