LogFAQs > #907881019

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	These 'downgrade' controversies from gamers have gotten really stupid
Tyranthraxus 08/31/18 3:23:53 PM #67:	DarthAragorn posted... Tyranthraxus posted... DarthAragorn posted... Swagnificent119 posted... l Dudeboy l posted... The problem I find is that people will watch trailers that clearly state something along the lines of "This is still in production, and can change from the final release" at the start of the trailer, but then people disregard that entirely and expect exactly the game showed in the trailer. The thing is, this used to mean gameplay things could change, or even that the graphics would get better. Now it pretty much only means shit isn't going to look as good. How much fucking money is wasted making things look that good only to not use it? Yeah I remember when early looks at games were actually unpolished alpha builds instead of overly polished bullshit builds Yeah it still happens. Just not with Sony exclusive games. Sony is the only company that lies like this. I think Ubisoft has actually been pretty great lately but they've definitely done this a lot That was predominantly with Watch Dogs. They don't do that kind of thing with their other games. Far Cry for the most part looks okay. Assassin's Creed is famous for graphical glitches but what they show is still pretty close to what you get. They also down graded the division but Ubi is still nowhere near as bad about it as Sony is. Every 1st party AAA game ends up being a complete lie. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:907881019] in These 'dow... [t:76952489]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarthAragorn posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarthAragorn posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Swagnificent119 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>l Dudeboy l posted...</cite> <quote> The problem I find is that people will watch trailers that clearly state something along the lines of "This is still in production, and can change from the final release" at the start of the trailer, but then people disregard that entirely and expect exactly the game showed in the trailer. </quote> The thing is, this used to mean gameplay things could change, or even that the graphics would get better. Now it pretty much only means shit isn't going to look as good. How much fucking money is wasted making things look that good only to not use it? </quote> Yeah I remember when early looks at games were actually unpolished alpha builds instead of overly polished bullshit builds</quote> Yeah it still happens. Just not with Sony exclusive games. Sony is the only company that lies like this.</quote> I think Ubisoft has actually been pretty great lately but they've definitely done this a lot</quote> That was predominantly with Watch Dogs. They don't do that kind of thing with their other games. Far Cry for the most part looks okay. Assassin's Creed is famous for graphical glitches but what they show is still pretty close to what you get. They also down graded the division but Ubi is still nowhere near as bad about it as Sony is. Every 1st party AAA game ends up being a complete lie. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1