LogFAQs > #907511159

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	A probability question
darkknight109 08/25/18 4:53:01 AM #18:	Kyuubi4269 posted... If it's not viable, it's statistically worse as you will lose more than the failure result if you fail. In that instance it is worse, not statistically worse. You are altering the problem by adding in additional variables when you do that. Yellow posted... If it's a one-off deal, then it's bad. Like, 99% bad. If it's a partnership, then it's very, very good. 100% good. Is that what you wanted? You can interpret it that way if you like. As a bit of a spoiler, at least part of your answer is wrong. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:907511159] in A probabil... [t:76935171]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>If it's not viable, it's statistically worse as you will lose more than the failure result if you fail.</quote> In that instance it is worse, not statistically worse. You are altering the problem by adding in additional variables when you do that. <cite>Yellow posted...</cite> <quote>If it's a one-off deal, then it's bad. Like, 99% bad. If it's a partnership, then it's very, very good. 100% good. Is that what you wanted?</quote> You can interpret it that way if you like. As a bit of a spoiler, at least part of your answer is wrong. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1