LogFAQs > #907170122

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Black kid arrested for wearing the wrong bandana
hockeybub89 08/19/18 5:06:55 PM #214:	The Admiral posted... Bio1590 posted... If red paisley-design bandanas are "gang colours" then I most definitely think that Walmart Canada (and many other retailers, let's be real here) would like to know that they are selling gang paraphernalia! Literally don't understand the way your brain works or why you think you have a point here. These were not made as "gang bandanas," the gangs adopted them. Of course they're going to be cheap and easy to acquire, since gang members are poor thugs and are going to get whatever is easiest and costs the least money. If Walmart stopped selling them, the gangs would just pick something else as their symbol, so there is no point in doing that. Point is, these are now considered a gang symbol and are banned at this kids' school. This is not a complicated issue to understand for anyone with normal thinking skills. I know you're emotional, but you probably should calm down and take a breather before making another irrelevant post. So if the people in those pictures Bio posted were in high school, they would be told to take off their gang colors while others wearing the same colors are ignored? Can we explain why some schools are OK with kids repping Confederate colors? Those represent a rogue nation based on slavery and have been used by terrorists and racists since while they commit violence and push white supremacist agendas. If bandanas have been ruined by Pirus and Crips, then symbols that were deliberately created with poor intentions certainly have been ruined by the thugs that have used them since. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:907170122] in Black kid ... [t:76911312]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>If red paisley-design bandanas are "gang colours" then I most definitely think that Walmart Canada (and many other retailers, let's be real here) would like to know that they are selling gang paraphernalia!</quote> Literally don't understand the way your brain works or why you think you have a point here. These were not made as "gang bandanas," the gangs adopted them. Of course they're going to be cheap and easy to acquire, since gang members are poor thugs and are going to get whatever is easiest and costs the least money. If Walmart stopped selling them, the gangs would just pick something else as their symbol, so there is no point in doing that. Point is, these are now considered a gang symbol and are banned at this kids' school. This is not a complicated issue to understand for anyone with normal thinking skills. I know you're emotional, but you probably should calm down and take a breather before making another irrelevant post.</quote> So if the people in those pictures Bio posted were in high school, they would be told to take off their gang colors while others wearing the same colors are ignored? Can we explain why some schools are OK with kids repping Confederate colors? Those represent a rogue nation based on slavery and have been used by terrorists and racists since while they commit violence and push white supremacist agendas. If bandanas have been ruined by Pirus and Crips, then symbols that were deliberately created with poor intentions certainly have been ruined by the thugs that have used them since. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1