LogFAQs > #907126616

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Anyone else here have zero desire to ever reproduce?
CiIantro 08/18/18 8:35:53 PM #38:	dolomedes posted... CiIantro posted... There is no defined "point" to evolution. It is simply the process of change over time. Obviously, natural selection is the process by which organisms that are best able to reproduce pass on their genes, but that doesn't make them "better". By your argument, a super-human with god-like intelligence who was also impotent would be inferior to some random piece of trailer trash with 8 kids. Your logic is flawed. you're the one talking about being more 'highly evolved' tbh. an impotent genius would have a lower level of reproductive fitness than your 'trailer trash' example. lol Nice to see that your sole interpretation of a beings worth is based on their reproductive capacity. How very narrow minded. <cite>CiIantro posted [p:907126616] in Anyone els... [t:76915526]...</cite> <quote><cite>dolomedes posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>There is no defined "point" to evolution. It is simply the process of change over time. Obviously, natural selection is the process by which organisms that are best able to reproduce pass on their genes, but that doesn't make them "better". By your argument, a super-human with god-like intelligence who was also impotent would be inferior to some random piece of trailer trash with 8 kids. Your logic is flawed.</quote> you're the one talking about being more 'highly evolved' tbh. an impotent genius would have a lower level of reproductive fitness than your 'trailer trash' example. lol</quote> Nice to see that your sole interpretation of a beings worth is based on their reproductive capacity. How very narrow minded.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1