LogFAQs > #906938052

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFreedom, Liberty, Ron Paul - Iranian War 4.0 Edition [dwmf]
foolm0r0n
08/15/18 4:19:14 PM
#396:


That's a much better argument than most economic analyses. The main flaw is that it's somehow giving the court case all the credit for abortion, which is a thing humans have been doing for thousands of years. Same with women working and building industry.

But reproductive rights are definitely an economic issue, like all other rights we argue about. There's no real significant morality involved.

SmartMuffin posted...
not considered: the entire foregone economic lifetime value of every aborted fetus

This is dumb because it's an additive argument. Each born baby = +1 to the economy. But the abortion argument is multiplicative, it enables the other 50% of the population to enter the economy, so it's 2x whatever the population is. Each born baby would thus be +2, or rather it would be +1 where previously it would be +0.5 (0 or 1 depending on sex). So you are arguing that you want both abortion AND higher birth rates (and higher immigration, etc).
---
_foolmo_
2 + 2 = 4
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1