LogFAQs > #906706478

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicWhat's this about White Nationalist Rally?
shokan_warrior
08/11/18 6:14:41 PM
#79:


BJ-blazkowics posted...
shokan_warrior posted...
BJ-blazkowics posted...


Ah yes, the old "ashnenazi and east asians are smarter, see? We're not supremacists, now excuse us while we call black, south asian and brown people dumb sub-humans" tactic. You guys are still using this gimmick?

Here is a little nice tidbit for you: America was first populated by the native americans (not white!). Then WASPS imported a lot of black people to do the work for them as slaves. Then they brought asians to work on the mines and railroads. Then they purchases Louisiana, which was full of creole people. Then they took over Spanish and Mexican lands, full of hispanics/mexicans. America was never a 100% white place, so the idea that now people like you want to ethnically cleanse it for white people (yes, Einstein, "we want our own country, for white people only, in America, so kick out the people of color" is called ethnic cleansing) is stupid as it gets.

@BJ-blazkowics
JFC
ok

the NATION of the USA is white(european)
the slaves were primarily for agriculture, NOT industrialization which was done by whites themselves in the north
and while SOME asians worked in the railroads they weren't the ONLY ones working on the railroads
it was mainly whites

the immigrant population was waaaaaaaay smaller then than right now so how can they magically have such a large population back then compared to now in order to contribute THAT much?????

the louisiana purchase included the territory currently containing the modern state of louisiana but also a HUMONGOUS territory going to montana, it was NOT composed of "creoles" or "mulattos", it was primarily NATIVE AMERICAN
the "mexican/spanish" lands DID have settlers from south of the border but it was mainly NATIVE AMERICAN
the COMANCHES and APACHES fought both the United States AND mexico at the SAME TIME during the 19th century
it was NATIVE LAND CLAIMED by mexico and spain

wtf is an "hispanic", just a spanish speaker, anyone, chinese, angolan, and peruvian can be hispanic

the natives are too small in number to control the land DEVELOPED by whites


so the mexicans are white to you now? LMAO

You don't get it, the US wasn't 100% white from the beginning. You're not gonna make it 100% white now. Try it, sunshine.

I'd tell you what I think about you but apparently the admin staff protects you

@BJ-blazkowics

What

The mexican population is a mixed population of varying degrees of native and European dna

The North American tribes like the Apache and Comanches(and others) are the REAL "owners" of the land

They fought both the USA and Mexico at the same time

What

To you, the only way you can steal native land is to be white???

They've been fughting each other AND mexicans(who are composed of natives FOREIGN to the south west US)

Sure

Some of the people living in the spanish owned south west were descended of the local tribes, but the overall Mexican government was from natives foreign to the US territories

The US was majority white and that majority built the country

Face it

The whites wrote the constitution and industrialized the country

That was all by the hand of whites

The taking of land and usage of resources for the service of the USA was done by whites

Unless you can find some BS about blacks organizing to steal large sections of native land or something but you'll never admit that as it doesn't fit your liberal narrative

AND you have no sources unlike me
---
never don't give up
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1