LogFAQs > #906474533

scar the 1 posted...

JFC. The original source from Riot likely went to Kotaku because they have a reputation of actually writing about sexism. Not a lot of gaming outlets do that. And guys, like Darmik said, this isn't some opinion piece where they criticize games for being sexist/racist/etc, it's an heavily corroborated piece of investigative journalism. Keep in mind, not only are there upwards of 30 independent sources confirming the story of Lacy, they would also have gotten to read the piece to verify that they weren't misquoted or anything like that. Hell, Kotaku or not, pieces like this are much close to actual journalism than all the reviews and reports of rumors that usually goes on.

This is a bunch of garbage. A piece of news is only as credible as its writers and the interests it serves. Neither of which is credible on Kotaku. They spend the vast majority of their time writing garbage articles that are heavily weighted to push some bizarre SJW agenda and you want people to take them seriously because you claim this particular story is well done? Even though it is covering the exact subject that they have written countless shit articles about in the past? Of which they have shown overwhelming bias to the point where they are widely mocked for it?

Let me post the definition of credibility since we have some people struggling to understand what that word means:

Credibility:

the quality of being trusted and believed in.

While I'm at it, let's look at another term that Kotaku fails to live up to:

Reliability:

the quality of being trustworthy or of performing consistently well.