| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | No, libertarians are NOT compelled to support social media censorship [dwmf] |
| foolm0r0n 08/01/18 3:58:21 PM #31: | SmartMuffin posted... I mean, at the most basic level, I follow a Meme page and group on FB where people regularly get banned for edgy memes. Getting "the zucc" or spending 30 days in "facebook jail" is taken as a badge of honor. This is a good example of the anti-market rigidity of your public-statement-centric philosophy. Tons of people go on FB just to post dumb shit and get banned. It's meaningless to them if they don't get banned. So how is this fraud, when it's specifically the service these users are seeking from FB? It's the contradiction of customer service. There will always be people who use a service for opposite reasons. That's why the market is necessary to decide these things. Public claims are just a marketing tactic for your service. If that marketing is fraudulent, then that's wrong but it needs an actual complaint with evidence and judgment to determine that. You can't just point at something you don't think matches the marketing (banning shitposters), because there are a ton of people who DO think it matches the marketing. --- _foolmo_ 2 + 2 = 4 ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |