LogFAQs > #906091732

Id argue that the situation between a company providing fraudulent data for engine performance and moderating the content on a social media platform is different, at least in part because the user agreements in a social media network tend to indicate that once you put things up there, theyre theirs. That youre sacrificing the right to say just anything by using their service.

Now are you saying that such agreements are buried in legalese and need to be made more clearly upfront? Perhaps a case could be made there. Are you suggesting as it seems might be the case, that once a social media platform becomes large enough in society that it has a greater responsibility to society to allow people to discuss the issues of the day free from constraint and that in your experience, this hasnt been happening?

That could be interesting. What specific sorts of speech is being restricted here, other than the general right wing you suggested? Because I certainly dont think you wrote this large intellectual sounding essay because they didnt let you call black people the n word or something. What is the deep discourse theyve been keeping from you?
---

Friend Foundation
My cat likes to slap around uncooked spaghetti. -TwinBee