LogFAQs > #906032891

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My Little Pony writer arrested for possessing CP
Tyranthraxus 07/31/18 2:11:59 PM #55:	FortuneCookie posted... Ivynn posted... It also doesn't help that child pornography is defined as pornographic images of anyone under 18. So "technically it's ephebophilia" is irrelevant. Porn featuring 16 and 17 years olds is still child pornography. It really shouldn't. Don't get me wrong, it should still be punishable. But the law should distinguish between children and people who are legally allowed to drive. I don't give a fuck about the ages of girls who are being tied down and raped for porn. That shit is abhorrent and I have no issues with calling it child porn on top of the fact even if she's 17 years and 364 days old. If exceptions were to be theoretically allowed, it would be for selfies, which should still be considered child porn but the minors making them shouldn't be punished. They should just be required to destroy the copies. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:906032891] in My Little ... [t:76857174]...</cite> <quote><cite>FortuneCookie posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ivynn posted...</cite> <quote>It also doesn't help that child pornography is defined as pornographic images of anyone under 18. So "technically it's ephebophilia" is irrelevant. Porn featuring 16 and 17 years olds is still child pornography.</quote> It really shouldn't. Don't get me wrong, it should still be punishable. But the law should distinguish between children and people who are legally allowed to drive.</quote> I don't give a fuck about the ages of girls who are being tied down and raped for porn. That shit is abhorrent and I have no issues with calling it child porn on top of the fact even if she's 17 years and 364 days old. If exceptions were to be theoretically allowed, it would be for selfies, which should still be considered child porn but the minors making them shouldn't be punished. They should just be required to destroy the copies. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1