LogFAQs > #905968037

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAn interesting conversation on race that none of you will listen to.
silentwing26x
07/30/18 12:48:45 PM
#87:


legendary_zell posted...
silentwing26x posted...
legendary_zell posted...
silentwing26x posted...
@Anarchy_Juiblex

legendary_zell is obnoxiously far left, arguably even a SJW. It is pointless to try to reason with him or have nuanced conversation. I routinely get him mixed up with hollow_shrine who is also extremely far left, to give you an idea of the content of his posts.


Pot meet kettle. Everything you've said here applies directly to you and always has, whether it's religion, capitalism, or Elon Musk. You fundamentally cannot help but become a hard liner for whatever belief system or person you're obsessed with this year. It shows an unbelievable lack of self awareness for you of all people to label someone else as doctrinaire.

I haven't said anything especially left wing or SJW like on this board or in real life. You are simply the same Proudclad that's always viewed those that don't believe as you believe to be idiots foaming at the mouth.


I've practiced and continue to practice changing my beliefs whenever new and better evidence becomes available. Even when it meant a massive 180 switch from my previous beliefs and acknowledging that I was egregiously wrong about something. That's not something you can say about yourself, so I'm not going to place any stock into your accusations/barbs.


It's not about your beliefs, it's about your attitude. I'm saying that regardless of your beliefs, you still have the same dogmatic attitude underlying everything and that's something anyone can see. Going from militant Christianity to militant atheism along with militant capitalism isn't as impressive when you approach all of them with the same attitude.

We're not even talking about the TCs point though. Or my original point in this topic.


You mistake confidence in what is the best available evidence I've got with dogma. I'm demonstrably not dogmatic because I consider alternative explanations of the evidence all the time. All you're doing is trying to refute any possible thing I say by pointing to a supposed character flaw because you know you wouldn't be able to refute what I say.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1