LogFAQs > #905843189

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTo anyone who still thinks it's selfish for Batman to not kill joker
legendary_zell
07/27/18 11:40:50 PM
#97:


Slayerblade11 posted...
legendary_zell posted...
Slayerblade11 posted...
legendary_zell posted...
Batman is already a very violent vigilante that cripples people nightly


Where do people get this from? Bruce tends to frown upon excessive force. The only time he severely injuries someone is if they really force his hand.


The way he hits people in the comics and movies would mess people up for life. He breaks limbs, punches people with his peak human strength and master technique, etc. It really doesn't take that much to permanently injure someone.


Criminals who carry weapons and try to kill people. Is he supposed to pull punches and wear kid gloves vs violent criminals?


I'm not disagreeing with the danger they pose or their evilness. I'm saying Batman already doles out a lot of physical punishment. Escalating that would make make it difficult for there to be hard limits on what he does, even taking his sanity out of the equation. When you add the fact that he's at least traumatized and crazy enough to take to the streets in a bat costume despite a life as a genius, billionaire, playboy, philanthropist...maybe killing a limit on killing peeps isn't a bad idea.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1