LogFAQs > #905822985

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTo anyone who still thinks it's selfish for Batman to not kill joker
Authentic_fan
07/27/18 4:26:34 PM
#53:



He does make immoral decisions. There are comics where Batman is a sadistic torturer. Also, isn't the existence of Robin arguably immoral? Certainly, it's highly questionable.


The thing about robin is nobody would have questioned that had The writers not killed him off in gruesome fashion

That, I believe, was good for the overall story of the character. But it's been told, I want to see another major moral lapse by Batman, not a miscalculation (which you could argue the Robin thing was), lead to some disaster.

I guess it's also fair to say that Batman let's Catwoman go quite often as well.

All this being said I haven't read all of the comics. I haven't read a Batman comic i haven't liked so far, maybe i should pick up another set.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1