LogFAQs > #905707633

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My friend told a woman, "fuck her and her ugly ass children."
Revelation34 07/25/18 3:50:39 PM #196:	darkknight109 posted... In Post 163, you claimed "Actually he never said they weren't thrown out too. If they actually fought then they would have been thrown out too" in response to me pointing out that the family wasn't thrown out. I mean, if you're not accepting that the family was thrown out, fine, but that means you've been arguing about nothing for the last few posts. You flat out claimed they were thrown out. There was no information either way. darkknight109 posted... If you're going to ignore the "burden of disproof" bullshit and sticking with the idea of "first post loses", I'll point out that the first response to this topic that actually addressed the subject claimed that the friend wasn't in the wrong. So I guess that means that the friend WAS in the wrong, until you can prove that he wasn't. Which you can't because something like that is entirely subjective and, therefore, impossible to prove. So... I win? Or are you ready to admit this is a really dumb line of logic? Again, I don't have to prove that something didn't happen (or, to put it another way, I don't have to disprove that something did happen). Logical arguments aren't constructed that way. There is no such thing as "burden of disproof" That is shit you made up. Burden of proof is on the person who makes the original claim. Even if it's something that everybody knows like the earth being round. You claimed the family wasn't thrown out so prove it. darkknight109 posted... Pain is not a valid reason to get angry, unless it was caused by someone (which this instance wasn't). It is definitely not a valid reason to lose self-control. Prove it. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:905707633] in My friend ... [t:76821379]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote> In Post 163, you claimed "Actually he never said they weren't thrown out too. If they actually fought then they would have been thrown out too" in response to me pointing out that the family wasn't thrown out. I mean, if you're not accepting that the family was thrown out, fine, but that means you've been arguing about nothing for the last few posts.</quote> You flat out claimed they were thrown out. There was no information either way. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>If you're going to ignore the "burden of disproof" bullshit and sticking with the idea of "first post loses", I'll point out that the first response to this topic that actually addressed the subject claimed that the friend wasn't in the wrong. So I guess that means that the friend WAS in the wrong, until you can prove that he wasn't. Which you can't because something like that is entirely subjective and, therefore, impossible to prove. So... I win? Or are you ready to admit this is a really dumb line of logic? Again, I don't have to prove that something didn't happen (or, to put it another way, I don't have to disprove that something did happen). Logical arguments aren't constructed that way.</quote> There is no such thing as "burden of disproof" That is shit you made up. Burden of proof is on the person who makes the original claim. Even if it's something that everybody knows like the earth being round. You claimed the family wasn't thrown out so prove it. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Pain is not a valid reason to get angry, unless it was caused by someone (which this instance wasn't). It is definitely not a valid reason to lose self-control.</quote> Prove it. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1