LogFAQs > #905024392

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe left eats their own once again.
Zodd3224
07/13/18 5:18:22 PM
#43:


gunplagirl posted...
Zodd3224 posted...
s0nicfan posted...
Zodd3224 posted...
This is a terrible example of "the left eating its race."

They have a point. Trans girls never cast as leading cis women, why wouldnt they bring up that a cis woman is playing a trans woman? Hollywood cant have it both ways.


I'd say it's a bad example of the left eating itself, but it IS an example of the left working against their own self-interest. ScarJo has a ton of star power and her inclusion would have brought significant attention to a movie that wouldn't likely have gotten much otherwise. The result would be a bigger turnout and more people having this issue brought to their attention. Choosing to demand a trans woman for a trans role over AAA star power for a social issue that they would also argue needs far more focus is shooting yourself in the foot a bit.


I wouldnt have an issue with them casting a cis woman for a trans role, but they never cast a trans woman for a cis role. Either go both ways or neither. Maybe the trans woman they have play the role this could be her big break.

I can understand why trans actors and actresses would be upset by that double standard.


This is a trans man though. They should cast a man, cis or trans. Not a woman and especially not a trans woman as that would conflate the issue on several levels more than merely casting a cis woman.


My mistake, trans man.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1