LogFAQs > #905013894

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic#URGENT: New indictment/s expected in Mueller probe
BWLurker
07/13/18 2:03:11 PM
#74:


s0nicfan posted...
BWLurker posted...
s0nicfan posted...
BWLurker posted...
ledbowman posted...
White House: "Todays charges include no allegations of knowing involvement by anyone on the campaign and no allegations that the alleged hacking affected the election result. This is consistent with what we have been saying all along."

lol

We're back to" Trump is too stupid to collude"


Do you think charges should be brought whether the individual in question was knowing or not?

Negligence. Also, it should be questioned if the individuals are fit for their position if treason ends up slipping under their noses.


So even if they didn't knowingly break the law, at the bare minimum negligence of their duties should be brought up, and the individual should likely be considered unfit for their position?

Uh, yes. If you're honestly oblivious enough to let this slide under your nose, well...
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1