LogFAQs > #904997209

@kirbymuncher posted...

EpicMickeyDrew posted...

kirbymuncher posted...

people only using the top of the scale is even worse in a 1-5 system because you have basically no space for rating at all

Then don't only use the top of the scale fuck. 3/5 is playable, most games are 3/5

I agree with the sentiment here but not the result... I don't want to be playing 3/5 games because I'd rather spend that time playing 4/5 games or 5/5 games. Just because it's not bad doesn't mean it's good, and if I knew in advance that a game I was thinking of playing would end up being a 3/5 to me I'd probably skip it. Not because it's awful but because I have no doubt there are plenty of better games out there as long as I could manage to find them

So you want to be tricked into playing 3/5 games? You're ok with playing 3/5 games as long as they're lumped in with with 4/5 5/5 games? You're happy to play 3/5 games if you don't know in advance that it's a 3/5 game? If anything you seem to be arguing for the 5 star rating system because it clearly helps you manage your time better. If this rating system allows you to skip games you'd rather not play I don't see the problem, or are you saying you do want to play games you wouldn't play if you knew how bad they are?
---

Just how, pray tell, does your dick "take life"? How could a dick take a life? - XciteMe