LogFAQs > #904825400

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Chris' political topic. Where Chris posts super casually about political stuff.
Corrik 07/10/18 1:18:11 PM #342:	ColZach posted... Youre correct Except the republicans did what they did and stole a seat Would he have been approved? We certainly wont be able to ever know given he didnt even get a hearing and thats the point. Republicans shouldnt get to pick and choose when they want to adhere to the constitution. They should have adhered to it then, and now they should play by the rules they have set. Like I said...if Garland had actually gotten a hearing this wouldnt be a topic of conversation for me. But Republicans just never play by any rules except rule of fuck democrats I go back and forth between amazingly brilliant political move and travesty. I mean, I guess it had little downside for them. They clearly wanted Garland to not be denied due to politics so they wanted to put it off with the thinking they definitely would have accepted him if Hillary won. They also clearly wanted to try and not replace a conservative with a liberal and wanted to do anything they could to get out of that situation. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:904825400] in Chris' pol... [t:76758633]...</cite> <quote><cite>ColZach posted...</cite> <quote>Youre correct Except the republicans did what they did and stole a seat Would he have been approved? We certainly wont be able to ever know given he didnt even get a hearing and thats the point. Republicans shouldnt get to pick and choose when they want to adhere to the constitution. They should have adhered to it then, and now they should play by the rules they have set. Like I said...if Garland had actually gotten a hearing this wouldnt be a topic of conversation for me. But Republicans just never play by any rules except rule of fuck democrats</quote> I go back and forth between amazingly brilliant political move and travesty. I mean, I guess it had little downside for them. They clearly wanted Garland to not be denied due to politics so they wanted to put it off with the thinking they definitely would have accepted him if Hillary won. They also clearly wanted to try and not replace a conservative with a liberal and wanted to do anything they could to get out of that situation. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1