LogFAQs > #904684554

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	New rule in Australia: all sexual partners must say "yes"
gunplagirl 07/08/18 12:44:17 AM #20:	the_rowan posted... gunplagirl posted... Yes to all of the above. It took long enough for western nations to say " hey, just because these two people are married doesn't mean that they automatically consent to sex with their spouse 100% of the time" Yes, as in they are currently, successfully making the argument, and this argument is why they receive a not guilty verdict? Yes, there's plenty of cases like this every year. They usually involve an unconscious woman at a party and as she was unconscious or intoxicated she could not consent. But the plaintiff, usually a man, says that she had consented and he wasn't aware of her condition. And more than a few of those cases result in a not guilty verdict because of reasonable doubt and the jury ultimately believing that maybe she had consented while intoxicated and that he didn't know she was passed out. If you want a name of one such person who has gotten away with that defense, Reid Andrew Dawson from a few years ago. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:904684554] in New rule i... [t:76786929]...</cite> <quote><cite>the_rowan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Yes to all of the above. It took long enough for western nations to say " hey, just because these two people are married doesn't mean that they automatically consent to sex with their spouse 100% of the time"</quote> Yes, as in they are currently, successfully making the argument, and this argument is why they receive a not guilty verdict?</quote> Yes, there's plenty of cases like this every year. They usually involve an unconscious woman at a party and as she was unconscious or intoxicated she could not consent. But the plaintiff, usually a man, says that she had consented and he wasn't aware of her condition. And more than a few of those cases result in a not guilty verdict because of reasonable doubt and the jury ultimately believing that maybe she had consented while intoxicated and that he didn't know she was passed out. If you want a name of one such person who has gotten away with that defense, Reid Andrew Dawson from a few years ago. --- Pew pew!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1